Why IMF bailouts keep Pakistan surviving, not thriving?

By Syeda Zuraira Fatima

IMF bailouts keep Pakistan afloat, but without deep reforms, survival remains the ceiling not prosperity.

04 September 2025
Why IMF bailouts keep Pakistan surviving, not thriving?

Pakistan's economy has been in a cycle of crisis, bailout, stabilization, relapse, and another bailout for more than 40 years.

The nation had joined its 24th IMF program by 2025. Every arrangement has been promoted as a watershed, but history demonstrates that this is not the case.

Pakistan's reserves are kept afloat by IMF dollars, but structural flaws cause it to fall back into the same abyss. Pakistan does not prosper, but it does survive.

A Fragile Recovery Masking Deeper Ills

In 2023, the $3 billion IMF Stand-By Arrangement opened up bilateral financing and avoided default.

By mid-2025, reserves had improved to about $14.5 billion, and inflation, which had previously reached 38% in 2023, had dropped into the low teens. Stabilization worked on paper.

But beneath these figures is a more sobering reality: according to World Bank estimates, 42% of Pakistanis were living in poverty in FY24, meaning that millions of people continued to suffer even as macroeconomic stability returned.

Why Bailouts Never Become Breakthroughs:

Weak Revenue Base

Pakistan continues to have one of the lowest tax-to-GDP ratios in South Asia, at about 10%.

Real estate developers, wholesalers, and landlords are among the elites who mostly evade the net.

Reform has been called for in several IMF programs, but political opposition guarantees that this promise will never be realized.

The Energy Sector’s Black Hole

By early 2025, the circular debt of the power sector had grown to Rs 2.4 trillion.

The system is weakened by inefficiency, theft, and postponed tariff adjustments.

IMF-driven tariff increases put a strain on businesses and households, but in the absence of governance changes, arrears reappear, necessitating new sector-wide bailouts.

Loss-Making SOEs

Pakistan Steel Mills and PIA are two examples of state-owned businesses that continue to be financial sinkholes.

Governments inject subsidies that exacerbate fiscal deficits rather than transparently restructuring or privatizing them. Although the IMF frequently emphasizes this, reform is still politically divisive.

Although, it is announced that PIA soon will be privatized but who knows what the future will hold?

How IMF debt trap becomes a spider web for third world countries? –  Shafaqna English | International Shia News & Fatwas

Debt Servicing Over Development

In FY25, interest payments are projected to consume 7.4% of GDP, leaving minimal room for development spending. This imbalance forces reliance on external loans, perpetuating dependency.

Climate Vulnerability

The 2022 floods, which resulted in losses of almost $30 billion, demonstrated how climate shocks can quickly destroy fragile economic stability.

Every disaster runs the risk of sending Pakistan back to the IMF if resilience is not adequately invested in.

The Human Cost of Austerity

Official reports frequently hail stabilization, but for the average citizen, it means austerity. The poor are disproportionately affected by increases in energy tariffs, indirect taxes, and reductions in subsidies.

The last bailout cycle saw a sharp increase in poverty, demonstrating that "stability" frequently entails putting the most vulnerable people under pressure.

Read More: KSE-100 crosses 153,000 amid strong investor confidence

Leadership and Accountability: Who Must Deliver

  • Federal Government & Parliament must enact tax reforms that expand the base—agriculture, real estate, and retail sectors must contribute fairly.
  • In provinces, increase own-source revenues instead of relying solely on NFC transfers.
  • Enforce loss-reduction targets, pre-paid metering, and targeted subsidies instead of blanket relief.
  • Introduce performance scorecards and pursue transparent restructuring or privatization.
  • Pair austerity with climate resilience and poverty safeguards; cash transfers to the poorest must be a permanent floor.

Lessons From Abroad

Egypt and Sri Lanka provide sobering parallels: repeated IMF programs restore reserves temporarily but fail to deliver prosperity when structural reforms stall. Pakistan’s trajectory mirrors this—stabilization without transformation, relief without recovery.

What Success Should Look Like

To escape the bailout trap, Pakistan must:

  1. Raise tax-to-GDP above 13% by 2027.
  2. Reduce circular debt transparently and permanently.
  3. Bring interest payments down to ≤5% of GDP through fiscal discipline.
  4. Reverse the poverty surge by cushioning reforms with social protection.
  5. Shrink the SOE footprint so it no longer drains the budget.

IMF bailouts keep Pakistan alive but never cure the disease. Each program buys time, yet time is squandered in political infighting and elite capture.

If taxation remains narrow, energy losses unchecked, and reforms half-hearted, Pakistan will return again to the IMF queue. Survival is not prosperity.

To thrive, Pakistan’s leadership must finally confront the entrenched interests blocking reform. Otherwise, the country will remain a patient forever on life-support—alive, but never healthy.